作者：丁鼎,程红

机构：山东师范大学齐鲁文化研究中心,烟台师范学院历史与社会学院 山东 济南 250014 ,山东 烟台 264025

中文关键词：车;;车制;;衡;;轭;;《新定三礼图》

英文关键词：carriage; carriage system; the front bar of a carriage; yoke; The Newly Collated Pictures of "The Three Rituals"

中文摘要：宋代学者聂崇义在《新定三礼图》中以“轭”释“衡”,将“轭”与“衡”看作同一物件。其误当是承源于汉儒包咸《论语注》。本文通过对有关文献记载和考古发现的考证,指出了聂氏与包氏的疏误,说明在古代车制中“衡”与“轭”虽有联系,但更有区别,二者并非同一物件。

英文摘要：In The Newly Collated Pictures of "The Three Rituals", Nie Chongyi, a scholar of Song Dynasty, expounded "the front bar of a carriage"(named “衡”in Chinese)by using "yoke"(named “轭”in Chinese), and considered the "front bar of a carriage" and "yoke" as the same things. In fact ,his error originated from the Annotation to the Analects of Confucius by Bao Xian, a Confucian of Han Dynasty. With the textual research of some related documents and the archaeological discoveries, in this thesis we point out the negligence and error made by Mr Nie and Mr Bao, and further indicate that in the ancient times, there are not only connections between "the front bar of a carriage" and the "yoke", but also differences in the carriage system. So we can conclude that "the front bar of a carriage" and "the yoke" are not the same things.

[中文刊名]：古籍整理研究学刊 [出版日期]：2005-07-30 [CN]：22-1024/G2 [ISSN]：1009-1017

下载全文 下载CAJ阅读器