作者：徐宝贵;

机构：韶关学院文学院;

中文关键词：

英文关键词：

中文摘要：<正> 郭沫若是古文字学大家,他的大作《石鼓文研究》在学术界是非常有影响的。但是,《石鼓文研究》的摹本及释文中出现了很多错误,有的错误在再版时已做修改,如《汧殹》篇的"鳑",《霝雨》篇的"滂",《吾水》篇的"金",《车工》篇的"(牛辛)"、"特"等字,都改得特别好。可是,还有大量的错误没有修改过来。有的字在初版时摹得很正确,但在再版时改错了,如《吴人》篇的"朝"字。现在,我们把郭先生没有改正或改错的错误加以纠正。学术乃天下公器,在学术面前,人人平等。不管是谁,正确的一定要加以肯定,错误的也一定要指出并加以纠正。只有这样,我们的学术研究才能不断健康地向前发展。因此,匡谬正误,是大家应尽的责任。

英文摘要：The present paper points out 43 errors in facsimiles(35)and decipherments(8)in Guo Moruo's Study of Inscriptions on Drum-shaped Stone Blocks and analyzes their causes,which can be summed up as follows:(1)Copying errors due to the influence of Shuowen《说文》(A Study of Principles of Composition of Chinese Characters),e.g."沔"and"(走散)"in《汧殹》and "鋚"in《田车》.(2)Copying errors owing to failure in the discernment of strokes,e.g. ""in《作原》,"平""(日翼)""迧"and"母"in《吾水》,"兔"in《田车》,"宣""搏"and"異"in 《銮车》,and""in《吴人》.(3)Mistaking strokes for stone veins and missing them out,e. g."渔"and"氐"in《汧殹》,"復"in《而师》,"我,""鸣"and""in《作原》,"邋"in《车工》 and"兽"in《銮车》.(4)Mistaking stone veins for strokes and wrongly adding them into characters,e.g."或"in《霝雨》,"师"in《而师》,"邍"in《田车》,"驭"and"阴"in《銮车》, and"朝"in《吴人》.(5)Copying errors due to un-understanding character components,e. g.""in《霝雨》and《銮车》,and"用"(卢),a component of"",in《田车》.(6)Errors owing to incorrectly copying original characters from rubbings,e.g."多"in《田车》and《銮 车》,and the second"如"in《銮车》.(7)Mistakes through oversights,e.g."如"in《吾水》 being mistaken for"女."(8)Misinterpretation under influence from previous researchers, e.g.""in《汧殹》being interpreted as"(鱼便)"and"(鱼帛)"as"绵".(9)Misunderstanding,e. g."",a component of"趀"in《车工》and that of""in《銮车》,being interpreted as "朿",and"卂",a component of"(艹卂)"in《马荐》,as"".

[中文刊名]：考古学报 [出版日期]：2007-07-15 [CN]：11-1209 [ISSN]：0453-2902

下载全文 下载CAJ阅读器