作者：肖楠;

机构：中国社会科学院考古研究所;

中文关键词：

英文关键词：

中文摘要：<正> 《小屯南地甲骨》(上)(以下简称《屯南》)出版后,我们又缀合了四十余片卜骨,其中多数是该书的卜骨缀合而成,少数(二片)是《屯南》之卜骨与其他著录中的卜骨缀合而成的。现将缀合的拓片、摹本及释文发表如下。 1.《屯南》6+H 1:J8,(图一) 时代:康丁

英文摘要：After the publication of Oracle Bones from the Site of Southland at Xiaotun, vol. Ⅰ,over 40 pieces of oracle bones are pieced together in the present article, the majority of which are pieced together from fragments published in the volume and a few (only 2 pieces) from ones published in the book and other works.Oracle inscription No. 2 here and oracle inscription No. 636 in the published book belong to the same set of oracle inscriptions and they are complimentary toeach other in content.Oracle inscription No. 11 here in this paper corrects the wrong punctuation, made by Kunio Shima in his book A Classification of Oracle Inscriptons from the Yin Ruins, namely in oracle inscription No. 4265 ia section "Newly Collected Oracle Bones from Beijing and Tianjin after World War Ⅱ, (3.43.6 plus 3.46.7 in Ye Zhong Pian Yu (鄴中片羽).Oracle inscription No. 33 in-the present paper represents an example that Hou Zu Yi 后祖乙 and Gao Zu Yi 高祖乙 occur on the same piece of bone, which providas a new evidence for Wang Guowei's theory that Gao ZuYi was Da Yi 大乙.This incription is pieced together from No. 2951 in the above mentioned book of the author and No. B2186 in An Additional Collection of Oracle Inscriptions from, the Yin Ruins, which proves that at least a part of the oracle inscriptions obtained from the Yin Ruins from 1923 to 1926 were unearthed from the Southland of Xiaotun Village.Oracle inscription No. 45 in the present article is preced' together from No. 4103 in our book and No. 1. 423 in The Collection of Oracle Bones from Nanjing and Shanghai after World War Ⅱ, which proves that, at least a part of these bones came also from the Southland of Xiaotun Village,

[中文刊名]：考古学报 [出版日期]：1986-07-15 [CN]： [ISSN]：

下载全文 下载CAJ阅读器