作者：岳纯之;

机构：南开大学法学院;

中文关键词：《唐律疏议》;;《永徽律疏》;;《开元律疏》

英文关键词：Tang Lü Shu Yi;Yonghui Lü Shu;Kaiyuan Lü Shu

中文摘要：我国学者杨廷福等曾认为现存《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》。郑显文先生最近在敦煌吐鲁番文书的基础上又提出新证,力证《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》不谬。但检讨郑显文先生的各项证据,发现并不足以支持现存《唐律疏议》为《永徽律疏》的观点,唯一可以肯定的就是,现存《唐律疏议》并不是永徽四年(653)的《永徽律疏》。

英文摘要：Chinese Scholar YANG Tingfu and other scholar had put forwards a viewpoind that Tang Lü Shu Yi,an existing criminal code of the Tang Dynasty,is Yonghui Lü Shu,a criminal code formulated at the first period of the third emperor of the Tang Dynasty.In 2009,Professor ZHENG Xianwen asserted that viewpoint once again and had provided his conclusion with some new evidences.By a careful re-examination,we don't had any helping informations goes close to the conclusion professor ZHENG asserted.Here,we have drawn another conclusion from the evidences he had offered that Tang Lü Shu Yi are definitedly not that yonghui Lü Shu which had compiled in 653A.D..

[中文刊名]：敦煌研究 [出版日期]：2011-08-15 [CN]：62-1007/K [ISSN]：1000-4106

下载全文 下载CAJ阅读器