作者：林悟殊;殷小平;

机构：中山大学历史人类学研究中心,华南农业大学历史学系 研究员 历史学教授,讲师

中文关键词：大秦景教;;宣元至本经;;洛阳;;经幢

英文关键词：

中文摘要：2006年5月在洛阳出土的唐代景教经幢,上勒唐景净所撰《大秦景教宣元至本经》(简称《宣经》),乃继西安《大秦景教流行中国碑》之后,有关唐代景教石刻的最重大考古发现,其与该经敦煌残本正可互补。本文据经幢拓片与敦煌本对勘,并参考国内已发表的录文简体本,制作了经幢本《宣经》校勘本。本文尚考证《宣经》敦煌本与经幢本的差异,认为唐代存在不同版本的《宣经》,而敦煌本应较经幢本为早。本文还考察了该石幢选刻《宣经》的内外原因,认为石幢并未把《宣经》全文刻完。最后,本文指出该景教经幢的发现,再次确认了20世纪40年代现世的所谓小岛文书B系今人伪造的写本。

英文摘要：The Nestorian dharani pillar found in Luoyang,May 2006,has been the most important stele finding concerning Nestorianism of Tang since the discovery of the famous Xi'an Monument in the 17~(th) century. On the dharani pillar,Daqin Jingjiao Xuanyuan Zhiben Jing composed by a Nestorian missionary Jing Jing(景净)was carved. Comparative studies then can be done between it and the cognominal fragmentary sutra unearthed at Dunhuang.A new collation of the Sutra from Luoyang is presented here by collating with the version from Dunhuang and other simplified ones which have been published in China.The author,whereafter brings forward that there must be some similar editions of the Sutra in the Tang Dynasty,and that the Dunhuang version might appear prior to the one from Luoyang. Furthermore,the author explores the internal and external causes of the Sutra's carving at that time,believing the Sutra was unfinished.It is concluded finally that with the support of this newly-discovered Nestorian dharani pillar,the Kojima collection B in the 1940s is a forgery made by contemporary people,undoubtly.

[中文刊名]：中华文史论丛 [出版日期]：2008-03-20 [CN]：31-1984/K [ISSN]：1002-0039

下载全文 下载CAJ阅读器